Skip to Content

This Implausible 90th-Minute Goal Should Probably Have Been Disallowed

A player stops a goalie's throw with his foot, and the ball bounces into the net

The 90th minute. Tied at 2. Hartford Athletic sent a cross into the box, but Philadelphia Union II goalkeeper Mitch Budler caught it easily. It looked like this USL Championship match, with big playoff implications, could be a draw.

Budler threw the ball forward. What happened next was the rare sports highlight that was both an incredible feat and a hilarious blooper. Danny Barrera, who'd come on in the 82nd minute, stuck his foot out … and scored, giving Hartford the 3-2 win.

Barrera's goal not only won the match, but it moved Hartford into first place in the league's Group F with just one match to go.

It was a great goal, and very funny, and serves the Union right for renaming its minor-league club “Union II" from the much-cooler Bethlehem Steel. But was it legal? At least one blogger says it wasn't. At SB Nation, Jake Catanese says the goal should've been disallowed.

“If obstructing a goalkeepers distribution was legal we would see this play multiple times a week. Since it’s not, and we don’t, we’re just going to have to remind everyone why I am and will always be a stickler for this play until morale improves. Simply, it’s a player safety issue - goalkeepers in possession (i.e. - holding the ball in their hands) need space and time to safely distribute the ball without worry of interference from opponents.… Attempting to challenge a goalkeeper in possession, regardless of contact with the ball or keeper, should be judged as a careless challenge and a caution issued to the offender to reinforce that this at the professional level.”

He even has receipts, pointing to a yellow card Bradley Wright-Phillips received in 2014 for a similar, if less spectacular, play, as well as a play where the Houston Dash's Rachel Daly had a goal disallowed earlier this year. Catanese is being a bit of a stickler here—he says he coaches 10-year-olds and is frequently exhorting them to get away from the goalkeeper—and others disagree.

I suppose it boils down to whether you believe Budler was “in the process of releasing it” when he threw the ball. And I think I agree with Catanese—it should've been disallowed.

Sorry to ruin the highlight for you. But that's the type of thing I like to do here at Defector dot com.

Already a user?Log in

Welcome to Defector!

Sign up to read some more free blogs.

Or, click here to subscribe!

If you liked this blog, please share it! Your referrals help Defector reach new readers, and those new readers always get a few free blogs before encountering our paywall.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter